![]() The one-repo-at-a-time limitation is too insane for me to deal with, though. Update : I no longer use Tower much either, although it remains the prettiest. In free beta, pricing to be announced later. $59. It is also kind of slow, and for truly huge repositories it is so slow it doesn't work at all. But with that limitation, it's far from clear. Remove that crippling (and frankly weird) limitation, and I believe this would be the clear winner at present. But then you crash into the single, jaw-dropping, earth-shattering design flaw: it can only view one repository at a time. Great history view, pretty much has all the features I remember from gitx, but with an attractive Mac design (a la Versions). It is easily the most attractive client, and very full featured. Tower is a client I heard of just a day after I bought GitBox. It still is about the simplest UI out there. Update : I no longer use GitBox, and most of the people I know who do are not programmers, but authors and such. Can use external Mac diff/merge apps like FileMerge, Changes, BBEdit, etc. You wonder if its developer has the resources to really keep this app improving at a good pace. But it's the only git client without the familiar lines-and-dots branch graphing, and it feels perhaps too simple. It is the only git client that has never once crashed on me-a good sign. It has fewer features, but is much more clean and solid-feeling than gitx. GitBox was the first of these recent clients that I heard of, and it is pretty good. Meanwhile, some of the older runner-up recommendations, like Gity, just never achieved enough traction to get very good, and their future doesn't look bright. I was grateful for it in its day, but it has been eclipsed by some of these newcomers. I no longer recommend gitx (or its forks). Until very recently, there was no git client for the Mac (or any other platform, for that matter) that was even remotely close to as polished and elegant as Subversion clients such as Versions or Cornerstone. However, now in 2011, several more visual git clients for the Mac have been released, and the competition is finally stiff. Later in 2009, the brotherbard fork of gitx would be the best choice. When this question was asked, I think the correct answer was almost certainly gitx.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |